Air Force considering alternatives to key ERP

October 30, 2011 — 2:14pm ET | By David Perera

Air Force deployment of a key enterprise resource planning system has lagged behind schedule, a service official acknowledged Oct. 27 before a House Armed Services Committee panel hearing.The service's Expeditionary Combat Support System is undergoing "strategic reassessment" by a joint Defense Department office of the secretary and Air Force team, said David Tillotson, Air Force deputy chief management officer, in his prepared testimony. The OSD-Air Force team is considering ECSS alternatives such as "building on the current ERP software, leveraging other service/Defense agency solutions, and/or modifying legacy capability," Tillotson added. Military Services and the Pentagon are under a congressional mandate to achieve audit readiness by fiscal 2017, a goal that Air Force officials have said they are at moderate risk of missing. ECSS, a supply chain management ERP meant to replace 240 legacy logistics and financial systems, was originally meant to achieve full deployment of its first increment across the service in October 2013. The Air Force first obligated money for the program in August 2005--meaning that the program has missed the 5-year deadline for DoD MAIS efforts to go through a full deployment decision. According to the ECSS major automated information systems annual report transmitted to Congress earlier this year, ECSS is operational at Hanscom Air Force Base. Another Air Force ERP, the Defense Enterprise Accounting and Management System, will require an additional $678 million on top of the $313.2 million already invested into it to bring it into full operational status by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, Tillots on also said in his testimony. ECSS is not the only service ERP to undergo major changes. The Navy's Future Pay and Personnel Solution--the service's successor to the canceled Defense Integrated Military Human Resources System--was reset from the engineering and manufacturing development phase (Milestone B) to the material solution analysis phase (pre-Milestone A) in October 2010, Navy Deputy Chief Management officer Eric Fanning said in his prepared testimony."The overarching goal is to first understand any issues affecting financial controls and the business processes leading toward audit ability. Once those issues are clear, the next steps will be to determine the appropriate remedy to enable solution," he wrote.During the hearing, Asif Khan, Government Accountability Office director of financial management and assurance, said a main challenge across all DoD ERP programs has been up front requirements definition.

Subscribe: http://www.fiercegovernmentit.com/signup?sourceform=Viral-Tynt-FierceGovernmentIT-FierceGovernmentIT

PLEASE DO CLICK ON THE COMMENT AREA TO READ THE COMMENT

1 comment:

nadiaasibebelan20 November 2011 at 21:19
Panorama’s ERP consultants know organizational change management. Successful ERP implementationprojects are less about technology and more about people and processes. As part of an effective ERP implementation, Panorama helps clients develop, actualize and sustain long-term organizational changes to best realize the measurable business improvements enabled by their new technology.
With a determined focus on tangible bottom-line results, key performance indicators and investment returns, Panorama consultants utilize best practices and Panorama’s PERFECT Partner® organizational change management methodology to optimize ERP technology for better business operations.
Then, continue to ensure clients realize gains by addressing the “human factor” – an oftentimes overlooked but critical element of any successful technology initiative. Working with staff to ensure familiarity with the software as well as any changed roles, responsibilities or processes, Panorama is able to increase both employee buy-in and overall operational productivity.
Many companies have realized impressive benefits by implementing ERP systems however, the success of an ERP implementation is influenced by a great many factors. User involvement is one of the most cited, critical success factors in ERP implementation projects. Generally, when users are involved in the implementation, the end result will deliver a better fit in relation to business processes and acceptance between the end users and the ERP system.
This white paper aims to identify specific actions required to make an ERP implementation successful from the perspective of user buy-in. It exams user awareness to change and user involvement and also looks at a comparison between user characteristics and related experiences. The goal of this study is to gain a better understanding of ERP success through leveraging user factors. ERP systems, like other new technologies that have emerged over the
years, will soon become well understood. Issues of implementation will cease to
be a problem as individuals with real experience emerge to guide companies. Further, the hype associated with promised capabilities should dissolve into well understood strengths and weaknesses of the systems offered by major vendors. This is not to say that these system will not continue to develop, it is just that true
knowledge about the systems will be available.
ReplyDelete
Replies